Holten Richmond Middle School
55 Conant St
Danvers MA, 01923, Essex County
Phone: 978-774-8590
Ranking: (527 out of 1,316, top 40%)*
Type: Regular Middle School
Status: Currently Operational
Grade: Grade 6 to Grade 8
School District: Danvers School District
Title I Eligible School: No
Magnet: NA
Charter: NA
Shared-Time School: NA
Students and Teachers
2013-2014 | 2012-2013 | 2011-2012 | 2010-2011 | 2009-2010 | 2008-2009 | 2007-2008 | ||||||||
Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | |
Total Teachers: | 68 | 67 | 66 | 70 | 68 | 68 | 72 | |||||||
Total Students: | 869 | 870 | 890 | 947 | 920 | 911 | 858 | |||||||
Grade 6: | 293 | 33.7% | 282 | 32.4% | 287 | 32.2% | 305 | 32.2% | 285 | 31.0% | 334 | 36.7% | 276 | 32.2% |
Grade 7: | 292 | 33.6% | 285 | 32.8% | 310 | 34.8% | 294 | 31.0% | 344 | 37.4% | 285 | 31.3% | 292 | 34.0% |
Grade 8: | 284 | 32.7% | 303 | 34.8% | 293 | 32.9% | 348 | 36.7% | 291 | 31.6% | 292 | 32.1% | 290 | 33.8% |
Ungraded: | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | NA | NA |
Student By Gender: | ||||||||||||||
Male: | 455 | 52.4% | 444 | 51.0% | 452 | 50.8% | 487 | 51.4% | 481 | 52.3% | 468 | 51.4% | 419 | 48.8% |
Female: | 414 | 47.6% | 426 | 49.0% | 438 | 49.2% | 460 | 48.6% | 439 | 47.7% | 443 | 48.6% | 425 | 49.5% |
Student By Races: | ||||||||||||||
American Indian/Alaska Native: | 0 | 0.0% | 2 | 0.2% | 2 | 0.2% | 6 | 0.6% | 5 | 0.5% | 5 | 0.5% | 1 | 0.1% |
Asian: | 22 | 2.5% | 17 | 2.0% | 16 | 1.8% | 18 | 1.9% | 16 | 1.7% | 11 | 1.2% | 7 | 0.8% |
Hispanic: | 39 | 4.5% | 40 | 4.6% | 39 | 4.4% | 47 | 5.0% | 45 | 4.9% | 42 | 4.6% | 31 | 3.6% |
Black: | 12 | 1.4% | 16 | 1.8% | 17 | 1.9% | 6 | 0.6% | 4 | 0.4% | 6 | 0.7% | 6 | 0.7% |
White: | 780 | 89.8% | 776 | 89.2% | 802 | 90.1% | 852 | 90.0% | 833 | 90.5% | 831 | 91.2% | 803 | 93.6% |
Hawaiian Native/Pacific Islander: | 3 | 0.3% | 2 | 0.2% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | NA | NA |
Two or More Races: | 13 | 1.5% | 17 | 2.0% | 14 | 1.6% | 18 | 1.9% | 17 | 1.8% | 16 | 1.8% | NA | NA |
Lunch Program: | ||||||||||||||
Free Lunch Program Eligible: | 141 | 16.2% | 140 | 16.1% | 150 | 16.9% | 137 | 14.5% | 109 | 11.8% | 62 | 6.8% | 38 | 4.4% |
Reduced-Price Lunch Program Eligible: | 39 | 4.5% | 54 | 6.2% | 57 | 6.4% | 33 | 3.5% | 33 | 3.6% | 40 | 4.4% | 17 | 2.0% |
Student-Teacher Ratio: | 12.87 | 13.00 | 13.59 | 13.62 | 13.63 | 13.40 | 11.90 |
Test Performance
Year | Test | Grade | Measurement | Score | School District | State Average |
MCAS | ||||||
2006 | English Language Arts | 6th Grade | % proficient | 71% | 69% | 64% |
2007 | English Language Arts | 6th Grade | % proficient | 75% | 75% | 67% |
2008 | English Language Arts | 6th Grade | % proficient | 77% | 76% | 67% |
2009 | English Language Arts | 6th Grade | % proficient | 72% | 72% | 66% |
2010 | English Language Arts | 6th Grade | % proficient | 72% | 71% | 69% |
2011 | English Language Arts | 6th Grade | % proficient | 79% | 77% | 68% |
2012 | English Language Arts | 6th Grade | % proficient | 70% | 70% | 66% |
2013 | English Language Arts | 6th Grade | % proficient | 72% | 71% | 67% |
2003 | Mathematics | 6th Grade | % proficient | 58.5% | 57.8% | 42% |
2004 | Mathematics | 6th Grade | % proficient | 54% | 54% | 42% |
2005 | Mathematics | 6th Grade | % proficient | 46% | 46% | 46% |
2006 | Mathematics | 6th Grade | % proficient | 44% | 42% | 46% |
2007 | Mathematics | 6th Grade | % proficient | 48% | 48% | 52% |
2008 | Mathematics | 6th Grade | % proficient | 57% | 56% | 56% |
2009 | Mathematics | 6th Grade | % proficient | 59% | 58% | 57% |
2010 | Mathematics | 6th Grade | % proficient | 58% | 57% | 59% |
2011 | Mathematics | 6th Grade | % proficient | 62% | 60% | 58% |
2012 | Mathematics | 6th Grade | % proficient | 58% | 56% | 60% |
2013 | Mathematics | 6th Grade | % proficient | 57% | 55% | 60% |
2003 | English Language Arts | 7th Grade | % proficient | 74.1% | 73.8% | 66% |
2004 | English Language Arts | 7th Grade | % proficient | 82% | 82% | 68% |
2005 | English Language Arts | 7th Grade | % proficient | 84% | 83% | 66% |
2006 | English Language Arts | 7th Grade | % proficient | 80% | 78% | 65% |
2007 | English Language Arts | 7th Grade | % proficient | 83% | 81% | 69% |
2008 | English Language Arts | 7th Grade | % proficient | 84% | 84% | 69% |
2009 | English Language Arts | 7th Grade | % proficient | 83% | 82% | 70% |
2010 | English Language Arts | 7th Grade | % proficient | 78% | 78% | 72% |
2011 | English Language Arts | 7th Grade | % proficient | 78% | 78% | 73% |
2012 | English Language Arts | 7th Grade | % proficient | 82% | 80% | 71% |
2013 | English Language Arts | 7th Grade | % proficient | 82% | 79% | 71% |
2006 | Mathematics | 7th Grade | % proficient | 48% | 47% | 40% |
2007 | Mathematics | 7th Grade | % proficient | 56% | 55% | 46% |
2008 | Mathematics | 7th Grade | % proficient | 51% | 50% | 47% |
2009 | Mathematics | 7th Grade | % proficient | 47% | 45% | 49% |
2010 | Mathematics | 7th Grade | % proficient | 67% | 66% | 53% |
2011 | Mathematics | 7th Grade | % proficient | 58% | 58% | 51% |
2012 | Mathematics | 7th Grade | % proficient | 55% | 53% | 51% |
2013 | Mathematics | 7th Grade | % proficient | 52% | 51% | 52% |
2006 | English Language Arts | 8th Grade | % proficient | 86% | 83% | 74% |
2007 | English Language Arts | 8th Grade | % proficient | 86% | 84% | 75% |
2008 | English Language Arts | 8th Grade | % proficient | 85% | 83% | 75% |
2009 | English Language Arts | 8th Grade | % proficient | 87% | 85% | 78% |
2010 | English Language Arts | 8th Grade | % proficient | 85% | 84% | 78% |
2011 | English Language Arts | 8th Grade | % proficient | 85% | 84% | 79% |
2012 | English Language Arts | 8th Grade | % proficient | 85% | 85% | 81% |
2013 | English Language Arts | 8th Grade | % proficient | 86% | 84% | 78% |
2003 | Mathematics | 8th Grade | % proficient | 40.7% | 40.3% | 37% |
2004 | Mathematics | 8th Grade | % proficient | 49% | 48% | 39% |
2005 | Mathematics | 8th Grade | % proficient | 49% | 48% | 39% |
2006 | Mathematics | 8th Grade | % proficient | 44% | 42% | 40% |
2007 | Mathematics | 8th Grade | % proficient | 50% | 48% | 45% |
2008 | Mathematics | 8th Grade | % proficient | 54% | 53% | 49% |
2009 | Mathematics | 8th Grade | % proficient | 48% | 46% | 48% |
2010 | Mathematics | 8th Grade | % proficient | 53% | 51% | 51% |
2011 | Mathematics | 8th Grade | % proficient | 63% | 62% | 52% |
2012 | Mathematics | 8th Grade | % proficient | 61% | 61% | 52% |
2013 | Mathematics | 8th Grade | % proficient | 58% | 56% | 54% |
2003 | Science and Technology/Engineering | 8th Grade | % proficient | 27.3% | 27.0% | 32% |
2004 | Science and Technology/Engineering | 8th Grade | % proficient | 37% | 37% | 33% |
2005 | Science and Technology/Engineering | 8th Grade | % proficient | 38% | 37% | 33% |
2006 | Science and Technology/Engineering | 8th Grade | % proficient | 41% | 39% | 32% |
2007 | Science and Technology/Engineering | 8th Grade | % proficient | 46% | 46% | 33% |
2008 | Science and Technology/Engineering | 8th Grade | % proficient | 49% | 48% | 39% |
2009 | Science and Technology/Engineering | 8th Grade | % proficient | 40% | 39% | 39% |
2010 | Science and Technology/Engineering | 8th Grade | % proficient | 39% | 38% | 40% |
2011 | Science and Technology/Engineering | 8th Grade | % proficient | 48% | 47% | 39% |
2012 | Science and Technology/Engineering | 8th Grade | % proficient | 43% | 42% | 43% |
2013 | Science and Technology/Engineering | 8th Grade | % proficient | 45% | 44% | 39% |
Some data by SchoolDigger.com.
* Holten Richmond Middle School was rated 3.5 out of 5 by USA.com. The ranking was calculated based on publically available historical Math and English performance data.